AI search news ·

Do AI engines cite homepages? In 1,147 cited URLs, 92.6% pointed at deep pages — and Claude cited zero homepages at all

92.6% of the 1,147 URLs that ChatGPT, Perplexity and Claude cited on our 12 small-business buyer questions (2026-08-03 run) pointed below the homepage. Claude cited zero homepages in 178 citations; Perplexity 17 of 717. ChatGPT is the one exception at 27% — and even there the homepages appear almost exclusively on tool-discovery questions, where the cited front page is a vendor's own. If your AEO plan is polishing the homepage, three of three URL-returning engines say the citable artifact lives deeper in the site.

Method, stated before the numbers

Same corpus as the rest of the citation-economy series: 12 pinned buyer questions × 4 engines × 3 samples each = 144 answers in one run (2026-08-03), citations read from each engine's returned citation payload. The cut is mechanical: parse every cited URL and classify its path — homepage (empty path, e.g. `vendor.com/`) or deep page (anything below it). One exclusion, stated up front: Gemini returns bare domains in its citation payload — 440 entries with no path at all — so it cannot enter a path cut in either direction. That leaves the three URL-returning engines: ChatGPT (252 URLs), Perplexity (717) and Claude (178) — 1,147 full URLs across 348 distinct domains.

The split: three engines, one direction

EngineCited URLsHomepagesDeep pagesHomepage share
Claude17801780.0%
Perplexity717177002.4%
ChatGPT2526818427.0%
All three1,147851,0627.4%
Gemini440 (domain-only)excluded — payload carries no paths

The deep pages are not scattered randomly through sites either: 52.7% of the 1,147 URLs sit in a recognizable content section (`/blog`, `/learn`, `/guide`, `/resources`, `/articles`, `/insights`, `/news`), and 34.0% have listicle-shaped slugs (containing “best”, “top-N”, “tools” or “-vs-”). And Perplexity's 17 homepage citations are not a diverse set: they cover seven domains, every one an AI-visibility tool vendor (aifindmybusiness.com, getvisibai.com, aivisitaudit.com, aiclicks.io, visibleiq.ai, trackmybusiness.ai, ailocaltool.com).

The ChatGPT exception is really a question-type effect

Buyer question askedChatGPT homepage citationsHomepage share
“What tools track whether AI recommends my business?”20 of 2774%
“What AI visibility tool works for a local business like a dentist or law firm?”20 of 2677%
“Which tools show how ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini recommend businesses?”9 of 2241%
“How can I check what ChatGPT says about my business?”0 of 160%
“How do I improve my business's visibility in ChatGPT and AI search?”0 of 240%
“What is a good AthenaHQ alternative for a small business?”0 of 190%

ChatGPT's 27% average hides a clean split: when the question asks which tool exists, it cites vendor front doors — 74–77% homepages on the two pure tool-discovery questions. When the question asks how to do something, its homepage rate collapses to zero and it cites articles like the other engines. The homepage citations are not “homepages beat content” — they are ChatGPT naming products, where the product's address happens to be its homepage.

What this means if you care about AI visibility

Limits

The practical reading: if AI engines are citing anyone in your category, they are citing a deep page — a comparison, a how-to, a listicle — not a front door. Whether any of those cited pages are yours is checkable directly: run the four-engine, three-sample measurement on your business in 60 seconds.

See your number

See which businesses AI names when your client's buyers ask.

Running this for clients? The $249 agency 5-pack audits five businesses, white-labeled.

Check a client's AI visibility

Begin your check

Free · 60 sec

No account · No card · 3 buyer questions, 2 engines

By running a check you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.

Who runs this